top of page

Controversy and Ethics Surround Jewellery with Nazi Links Set to Fetch €137 Million at Auction

The recent news about the auction of jewellery with Nazi links has caused controversy in the international community. The jewellery is set to fetch 137 million Swiss francs, and despite the criticism, the auction is still scheduled to take place in Switzerland.

The auction includes a diamond ring that belonged to Hitler's mistress, Eva Braun, and a gold watch that was given to her by the dictator as a birthday present in 1939. Other items up for auction include a brooch with a swastika and a pendant with a portrait of Hitler.

The sale of such items has sparked outrage from Jewish groups and anti-fascist organizations, who argue that it is inappropriate to profit from objects associated with the atrocities committed during the Holocaust. They also fear that the auction could attract neo-Nazis and other far-right groups who may use the items as symbols of hate.

However, the auction house responsible for the sale argues that these objects have historical significance and should be preserved for future generations. They claim that owning such items can provide insight into the ideology and propaganda of the Nazi regime, and can help to educate people about the horrors of the Holocaust.

This debate raises important questions about the ethics of buying and selling objects with a dark history. Should we celebrate these objects as historical artifacts, or condemn them as symbols of hate? Can we separate the historical significance of an object from its associations with atrocities committed by those who owned or used it?

One perspective is that objects with Nazi links should be treated with the same sensitivity as artifacts from other atrocities, such as those associated with slavery or colonialism. In these cases, museums and other institutions have sought to contextualize the objects and educate visitors about their historical significance, while acknowledging the pain and suffering that they represent.

Similarly, the auction house responsible for the sale of the Nazi-linked jewellery could provide historical context for the items and donate a portion of the proceeds to Holocaust education or other relevant causes. This approach would honor the historical significance of the objects while also recognizing the need to acknowledge and address the harm they represent.

However, others argue that buying and selling such objects is inherently immoral, as it perpetuates the legacy of the Nazi regime and allows neo-Nazis and other hate groups to use them as symbols of their ideology. They argue that objects with Nazi links should be destroyed or kept in secure archives, where they can be studied by historians and researchers but not displayed or sold to the public.

Ultimately, the decision about whether to buy or sell objects with Nazi links is a complex and nuanced one that requires careful consideration of their historical significance and the harm they represent. While it is important to remember and learn from the atrocities committed during the Holocaust, we must also be mindful of the potential harm that these objects can cause if they fall into the wrong hands.

As members of the global community, we have a responsibility to ensure that we do not contribute to the perpetuation of hate and discrimination. By acknowledging the historical significance of objects with Nazi links while also condemning the atrocities committed by those who owned or used them, we can work towards a future that is free from the prejudices and hatred of the past.


bottom of page